The Magic of Making Up... Best Friends Again!
Powered by MaxBlogPress 
Play The Game Of Life

Sex Games as Adult Games of Sexual Excitement against Premature Orgasm

Sex games are adult games to enhance sexual excitement before it fizzles out in premature orgasm.

Adult behavior is defined as mature behavior.

Anything premature springs out of an impatient immaturity that we all are victims to.

Sex Games

Humanity needs playing these energy games in as cool a manner as is technically possible to do so.

Excitement is hot.

Excitement is energetic as well.

Is energy always hot?

It's not so. It shows up its heat in the beginning phases when it starts mounting up. It heats up to the point of wildly boiling hot tending to vaporize out of the body.

Sex Games

This is what is to be called premature if we let it happen so. But if we hold it without letting it get vaporized, through steadily and successively going on increasing its magnitude in a steady graph rather than a steep one, it starts getting cooler after a threshold is reached.

Sex Games

After this point is reached, the sexual excitement further builds up in a very cool manner enveloping the entire body and not only the genitals.

Its magnitude goes way more than our body was habitually accustomed to be able to deal with.

Sex Games

The cool energy very easily stays in the body as an organic part of our being to play the game of life intense.

The Psycho-biology of The Climax


29 Comments

  1. razzmattazz says:

    You say premature “orgasm” and not “ejaculation”. That’s very interesting! It is like you are talking about and infinitely-lasting orgasm! That should be the holy grail of mankind I think, but don’t expect the government or religious heads of society to ask people to pursue this holy grail rather than the fantastical one, because people will not need religions or governments if they know the truth about their body.

    To me it seems like we prematurely orgasm because we do not have the tolerance for enhanced states of pleasure. Our bodies have such a dichotomous relationship with pleasure that we pursue pleasure at every step of our life, but we still are unable to handle it when it flows beyond a threshold.

    Tell me anything that a human or another animal does that is not for the ultimate expectation of pleasure? And, yet, pleasure is mostly a bad word for society. As you have written elsewhere, a child’s sense of pleasure in playing with its genitals is bludgeoned by the parent, and that is the start of our relationship with our senses going haywire. This is according to society is the more honorable way to live, to deny our body and to create fantastical gods and social regulations to control that which is a result of those controls–a deformed mind-body.

  2. gbsingh says:

    Hi Saghir,

    You said: “To me it seems like we prematurely orgasm because we do not have the tolerance for enhanced states of pleasure.”

    How did you realize that?

    G B

  3. razzmattazz says:

    GB, I have experienced this with my own body. Many times I intuitively feel that my body is capable of a sexual pleasure that can be mind-blowing and life altering, but habitually I don’t let it go there. I have correlated that to familial and social conditioning that is now woven into my body deeply and is tolerant of pleasures only to a certain extent before orgasm happens. That is the average pleasure-tolerance level of men across the board around us, and I am part of the fabric, but I know deep inside that it is a conditioned behavior and I am just unable to tolerate enhanced states of pleasure–yet.

  4. razzmattazz says:

    Also, the body erection that you talk about in many of your posts, I too have felt it fleetingly. I have come to know of it as very phallic in its character but in my case most times I only intuit about it and rarely experience it. Various points in my body stop it from going all the way through.

    When I think about it it seems like the force for all action of our senses as well as our breath is rooted symbolically in the sexual, particularly in the energized phallus faced with its object of desire (usually women) as well as the aroused energy of the object in becoming one with this phallus (usually man).

    Since all the phenomena we experience around us is through our senses, it seems like all phenomena indeed is rooted in the sexual. (When I say sexual, I actually mean phallic because it is the active force, and while the passive force is as important, it is assumed to be present if there is an active force present.)

    Come to think of it I and you would not have been here without the sexual experience so what I experience must be true.

    In our sex-pleasure-negative objectified society it seems like this is the last theory of life that anyone will permit you to talk about without either ridiculing you or putting you in jail, so it’s no wonder that there are no information available for the exploration of one’s own body and the force that creates it and is created by it. I was therefore very happy to see your posts about your personal and direct experience with this force (isn’t it) and I felt like adding my few cents to them today. If you have any suggestions or advise for me I will appreciate.

    Thank you.

  5. gbsingh says:

    Hi Saghir,

    What if we ‘determine’ to go beyond the “average pleasure-tolerance level of men across the board around us”?

    The game that I am talking about playing with Eva in my posts these days just takes one there only, i.e., the bodies getting stretched beyond their normal habitual capacities, both horizontally as well as vertically!

    Are my words above able to tell you what I am meaning by them?

    G B

  6. razzmattazz says:

    Hello GB, I think I know what you mean by the ’stretch.’ The stretch has the feel of the universal force that is the basis of all consciousness. Also, I feel that this force is most deeply felt as the force during a sexually aroused state. I have only rarely felt the horizontal stretch but whenever I have, I liken it to the force present in a naturally-occurring wide smile. I would like to keep the permanent stretch in my body but it seems like effort toward achieving it is actually futile. It arises in effortlessness and effortlessness cannot be learned. What do you think?

    Looking forward to reading more about your experiments with Eva.

  7. gbsingh says:

    Saghir,

    The horizontal stretch cures the nasty myopia in the eye. The vertical stretch cures the presbyopia.

    But the presence of both together is a must in both the treatments.

    When we tend to smile, we do tend to stretch horizontally (although only in the skull); but at the same time we automatically (in fact habitually) contract ourselves vertically (in the skull) also; so the healing effect of smiling doesn’t affect the skull.

    Are you getting my point? It’s a hell of a lot tough language to communicate!

    G B SINGH

  8. gbsingh says:

    Saghir,

    The way of disciplined sex is the most ‘effortless’ way to achieve that horizontal (along with vertical) stretch ‘permanently’ into the body but only after the body has crossed a certain threshold of stretch.

    There is one more way, which requires me to spend a good amount of money on its testing that I don’t have with me at the moment. But I will have it one day and then I will duplicate it through making copies of the first prototype, and distribute them for healing humans all over…

    … Ha ha ha! Building castles in the air! Am I?

  9. razzmattazz says:

    GB, sorry I was having computer problems so couldn’t get back to you earlier.

    I understand your experiences with the stretch. The smile, eye, lip movements and indeed consciousness itself is premised on this stretch which is rooted in the most primary energy which is the energy of sexual attraction. From reading your posts and from my own limited but powerful experiences I think I have deduced the above and maybe you agree.

    I will be in Delhi in the second week of April and would like to come see you. If you will not be around, please let me know in advance. Among other things I am interested in learning from you what you mean by creating a prototype that could be replicated. (Sorry to say but it sounds mechanistic to me). My understanding is that each individual carries a lot of karma that is present in the body as armored memories and can be dissolved only through a long process of self-realization. But again, you may know something that I don’t and I would be interested to know if you could share.

  10. gbsingh says:

    Yes, you deduced it right, Saghir!

    You are welcome in Delhi. I’ll be here only.

    It’s mechanistic and that’s the beauty of it. In one single moment you can be free of all your karma, which is (basically) ingrained in your body musculature as well as in your mind – the two being complementary to each other in terms of space (body) and time (mind).

    Both are mechanistic in their sticking to their karma, and if a creative ‘mechanism’ can extract them out of their slumber, it’s the only thing that the world requires most urgently right now.

    G B

  11. razzmattazz says:

    GB, your insights are very inspiring. Thank you.

    I understand that the world may require this very urgently, but do you think it is even asking for this change? The world is at a stage where it is not even beginning to look inside. I don’t even think most people know there is an inside because the outside is all that they see, know, and believe. And this habit is perpetuated generation after generation. Isn’t it?

    If you could, can you explain what you meant by ‘testing, duplicating, and distributing the prototype’? Do you want to build some sort of a device? What could you be referring to?

  12. gbsingh says:

    The world may not be asking for a change, but it is screaming for getting its (people’s) chronic lifestyle diseases – diabetes, hypertension, heart condition, headache, aches and pains in the joints, obesity etc – cured permanently in an easy and sure way.

    ‘testing, duplicating, and distributing the prototype’ means executing it on the first person and checking the results, before its copies are made and executed in various parts of the world by the trained individuals (trained by me).

    Yes, it is a software device.

    G B

  13. razzmattazz says:

    GB, I get your point about the ‘change.’ Of course, there isn’t a person in the world who would not want to rid himself or herself permanently of these and other afflictions.

    I have another question of you. I hope I am not bothering you too much, and you may take your time to answer or not answer it.

    My quesion is: isn’t death (or let’s call it the slow degeneration of the body and its ultimate consummation by gravity) the biggest disease of all? I cannot believe that death can be the natural end-road of life. Life is too beautiful for this affliction to possess so much certainity. Death is after all a defeat of life and beauty. Isn’t it?

  14. gbsingh says:

    May be death is as beautiful as life is… or may be death is much more beautiful… may be it’s not the end of everything – I am just saying ‘may be’, I am not perpetuating any belief or faith.

    In fact I see body as ‘degeneration’ in itself only because it needs orgasm in order to perpetuate itself.

    The whole question is (and I am not going spiritual) if we can get rid of the ultimate consummation by gravity as well as by oxygen by training body in the way of energy.

    May be life and death become the two sides of the same coin them, which we can flip any way we want, whenever we want!

    The biggest ugliness of life is our ignorance of the intricate system of existence that this universe in itself is. May be death ‘remembers’ it all what life has made us ‘forget’.

    But I am just saying ‘may be’ only! (And I am trying to remember what life has made me ‘forget’ through training my body further and further into a state, which I call ‘beyond all stretch’.

    For me, investigating into the unknown is the biggest joy and a real thing of beauty!

    But again my ‘language’ might not be able to convey it all…

    G B

  15. razzmattazz says:

    GB, you have put forward some very interesting points, some of which I do not grasp fully.

    Orgasm has been referred to as the ‘little death,’ and that is not for no reason.

    To me life means the erectile potency of the body and its senses, while death is its opposite.

    I believe that the body even exists actually as a result of the separation of the two forces that happens at the climax/orgasm (thus separation) from the infinite state of unity.

    Are you suggesting the same when you say “I see body as ‘degeneration’ in itself only because it needs orgasm in order to perpetuate itself” or is it something else you are suggesting?

  16. gbsingh says:

    Climax (though it can always go still higher up) is energy consummated in the body, orgasm throws it out. Now I don’t differentiate the two states with life and death but with lively (in other words, energetic and creative) and dead (in other words, mechanical and energy-less).

    We denote energy-less with dead in our language, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that death is ‘dead’ too…

    Who knows!

    Not only body, but all existence – animate and inanimate – springs up as a result of separation from the infinite state of unity, which in other words is exactly equal to zero, i.e., it doesn’t exist!

    Infinity = zero (even in the exact mathematical sense).

    Can you mull it over?

  17. razzmattazz says:

    GB, dead (as we know them) things are waiting to be part of some life (as we know them) and the circle goes on and on. It is clearly observable in our universe and this may mean that what we call dead are not really dead but just another form and there may actually be no difference between dead and living things at all!

    When I talked about death, I meant the observable degeneration of the body as one ages in most human and animal bodies and the loss of the ability to use the senses and the body overall to live life to the fullest and then the final collapse of this body. It is a fact that youth is the time of most potency in terms of sensual acuity and sexual prowess, and if it were possible, no one would wish to become old in our world because an ageing body clearly starts losing what we know as a fully healthful state of being and finally (it appears) merges into the unknown.

    Now, reading about your experiences with the stretch and my own very limited experiences with it, I felt like it signified “real life”. I felt like most of the time my living state is like of a weak, semi-dead state. For the first time I got a slight but very powerful glimpse into what it could mean to be ‘really’ alive, and my questions about an ‘alive’ body and a dying body (as most bodies are) became very acute. To me it seemed like the degenerating body of older age is the anti-thesis of this energy, which is why I posed you the question.

    Currently I am again living in a very weak/un-alive state again for many months. My TMJ, forehead, jaws and eyes feel all numb and when I try to feel them, I feel acute pain, real acute pain. In my case this energy keeps circling my body from head to toes over periods of months and it seems like through all the numbness and pain it wants me to focus attention on one region of the body after another. And then it explodes into (like genital) orgasmic spasms at localized areas of my body, mostly from the top of the head to the throat. Then I may begin to sense a part of my face, chest, or back that I never sensed before and then the process moves on. Right now it is working very very strongly in the region above my chest and it is not an easy thing to go through, you may perhaps know.

    I did not want to specifically bother you with my experiences with this energy but thought you may be interested to know in how many other ways this could play out.

    Regarding infinity = zero, I have read you mention this elsewhere and I sometimes try to think about the infinite time-space around us but my mind grinds to a “zero” whenever I try to do it! That’s the only relation between them I am able to grasp at this point :)

  18. gbsingh says:

    Saghir,

    I can very well associate with what all you are mentioning about your body experiences.

    What I mean to say is that the body is not a perfect creation as its source of coming into existence is diversity and not unity; so even in our youth it is not a very efficient tool that we have at our disposal, as our body always keeps its muscles contracted.

    What all we can do at any age is stretching it to the point for it to be able to ‘home’ as much energy as is available to it, and thus be a carrier of total energy-flow through it without any resistance on its part.

    Can you see, I am always back to biology and physics after every excursion of mine into philosophy as it shows us no ’specific’ direction?

    G B

  19. gbsingh says:

    Sex facilitates stretch before it degenerates into orgasm throwing body back into its habitual contraction.

    G B

  20. razzmattazz says:

    Yes GB, everything is finally grounded in biology and physics, and chemistry too! In my opinion, philosophy only occurs when these forces are out of sync, otherwise things would be just as they are without any speculation at all.

    I understand how sex facilitates the stretch but it has been so far impossible for me to not habitualy orgasm after a certain period, so this lack of discipline punishes me a lot, and I know that.

    Sexual energy and its intersections within the body-mind system is extremely enchanting, complex, and very enticing and mysterious. The deeper I go, the more beautiful it becomes, and the more beautiful it becomes, the more ugliness it exposes in my body-mind. It is exhilarating, and terryfying, in turns.

    Are both two sides of the same coin or is ugliness a temporary condition that asks that it be overcome to find unending, eternal beauty?

  21. gbsingh says:

    Saghir,

    I imaginatively hypothesize that if our body stretch done in all the right directions crosses a threshold, the ugliness will immediately be gone.

    Why do I hypothesize so?

    …Because I myself have crossed many ’smaller’ thresholds from where there is no going back to the older ugliness.

    The final big threshold that I am talking of has thus come imperatively to me; it being one big jump after many small ones – which is how nature works in the process of change too.

    It’s that final crossing that I am reasonably speculating jumping through with the help of the device I dream (ha, ha, ha) making!

    No going back to ugliness after that any more…

    G B

  22. razzmattazz says:

    GB, I have another question. I hope you do not mind me asking.

    What is it about this ‘device’ that you always mention it with some amount of mirth :) ? Is it that dream-like and difficult to construct? Or is it so expensive to bring into fruition that it feels almost dream-like?

    Curious to know.

    Philosophically speaking, I think that ugliness is zero (exists but is not real), while beauty is infinity (is real but is broken up, and zero is created when the mind comes into play).

    Just my thought.

  23. gbsingh says:

    Yes, it is so expensive to bring into fruition that it feels almost dream-like.

    But only the first prototype of it!

    Next duplicate copies will be almost free of cost (as well as free of charge!).

    Biologically speaking, I think that ugliness is ‘closed in’ and ‘dropped down’ posture of the body.

    Psychologically speaking, I think that ugliness is ‘mind’ existing as separate from ‘brain’.

    Physically speaking, I think that ugliness is observing objects and events without having a bird’s eye-view.

    Sexually speaking, I think that ugliness is either no-excitement or/and orgasm.

    Economically speaking, I think that ugliness is money or the concept of ownership.

    Politically speaking, I think that ugliness is the political borders, the armies and politics itself as a ‘game of power’ that it is to be defined as in its essence.

    Socially speaking, I think that ugliness is ‘marriage’ as the basic unit of society.

    Educationally speaking, I think that ugliness is the academic pattern of schools, colleges, universities and business management institutes.

    Religiously speaking, I think that ugliness is the very concept of faith.

    Philosophically speaking, I think that ugliness is not experientially realizing that infinity and zero are exactly the same things (it again links to not having a bird’s eye view).

    G B

  24. razzmattazz says:

    GB, I am quite curious to know what this device is like. Maybe you ‘may’ tell me when I meet you!

    Such a clear enunciation of ugliness, as you have done above, tells me that my own ideas about beauty and ugliness is based upon some cosmic truth that unfolds in people overly curious about life or in people who are forced to confront the pain of their existence by looking inside deeply.

    About marriage, money, mind, nationalities, religion, and others, I too have had these exact same views as yours develop into me over the past 5 years or so, but I do not have the conviction yet to state them with as much force and clarity as you have done above, not even to myself. And much less to others.

    That leads me to ask why the vast majority of the world population through history have not had questons about the status quo arise in themselves so that we could have inherited a much less ugly world to start with?

  25. gbsingh says:

    All these – marriage, money, mind, nationalities, religion, and others – are things that command a great respect in human society and culture. Speaking against them is like speaking Greek and Latin to people who only know English. :)

    You seem to know either Greek or Latin… Tell me which one do you! :lol:

    G B

  26. razzmattazz says:

    GB, I am traveling, and will catch up with you in less than 2 weeks when I visit Delhi. Are you only able to meet on Sundays or are there other evenings in the week where you are available?

    Thanks.

  27. gbsingh says:

    Hi Saghir,

    My evenings are busy except for Saturdays and Sundays.

    Happy journey!

    G B

  28. razzmattazz says:

    Thanks GB. I will be in Delhi on 7-8 April. I will call you to set up a time to meet you on the Saturday of that week.

  29. gbsingh says:

    Welcome!

Leave a Reply

Play The Game Of Life is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache